My inquiry into the museum’s past helped me understand where the
museum was and where I think it should be. Over the past couple of days,
that distance has grown exponentially as I mentally list all of the
steps that have to take place on my end to make that happen.
Museum exhibits and educational programs are the public face of the
institution. They are, in effect, the museum’s identity. The most any
average visitor interacts with a museum is typically a visit to the
website and a brief tour of the exhibits. If the museum’s website is
static and uninviting, what makes the person want to come see more? And
then once they get here, if the exhibits are dated, boring, and racist
Whitey-centric, then what does that say about the institution? Since
that’s not the message I want to get across, the museum desperately
needs new exhibits.
Exhibits are typically based on what the museum has in its
collections. So in order to revamp the exhibits, I need to get to know
the collections. Since only 300 of the 25,000 or so objects we have are
catalogued, that’s a tall order. For several reasons. One, the items
that have been catalogued might be nice to look at, but they aren’t
necessarily significant or illustrative of any particular historical
period or theme. That box full of 30 wedding veils has some nice
examples of lacework, but unless I’m talking about women’s fashion
through the ages or even domestic gender roles, I’m not sure I’m going
to need them. Two, the items that are significant don’t necessarily meet
our current mission. We have an amazing collection of contemporary Hopi
decorated pottery. But the museum’s mission is to interpret the history
of the local metropolitan area, and Hopi live about 250 miles away.
Three, the documentation that we have is often problematic when it comes
to provenance. Just because someone said on their donation
form that this is the quilt that Abraham Lincoln slept under doesn’t
make it so. I’m a historian -- I need proof. Four, the stuff that the
museum has consists of unsolicited donations. So while we have some nice
things, there are enormous gaps for which we have virtually nothing to
exhibit. I’m glad that we have thousands of textiles, kitchen wares, and
jewelry from the Victorian era. But most of the area’s history lies in
the 20th century, and so far I’ve come across virtually nothing from the
20th century. (Could be because a lot of families are still passing
down their 20th century stuff and aren’t ready to let it go yet. Could
be that a lot of the 20th century hasn’t gotten to an age where it’s
considered “historic” yet. And it probably has a lot to do with the
urban influx of people from other places -- most people who live here
aren’t from here. But none of that solves the problem of having
virtually nothing to “show” for the 20th century.) And five, how am I
supposed to exhibit the stuff that lies so far beyond the museum’s
purview that it verges on ridiculous? Why in God’s name, for instance,
do we have a whale bone? Or a rare mineral from Michigan’s upper
peninsula?
As you can see, improving our understanding of the collection takes
time. There’s a learning curve for the information we do have, and then
there’s thousands of items for which I’ll have to generate new
information through research. And when my time is divvied up among
giving tours to second graders 4 to 16 hours per week, staffing the
front desk 8 to 16 hours a week, writing grants, endlessly frustrating
meetings with the Boss, working as a bartender at fundraisers, and
recruiting new volunteers, how the hell can I carve out the time
necessary for brainstorming, research, and writing? Not to mention
sleep.
One of the ways that I’ve proposed to make progress is to work on our
website. Our website is pathetic. Static, dated, and whatever is the
opposite of interactive. It is an embarrassment. Even in trying to
promote us, it fails miserably. For the content on the museum’s
collections, someone (my predecessor?) wrote the following: “All
cultures and ethnic groups that have been instrumental in shaping the
economic, social, and political development of Phoenix both prehistoric
and historic, are considered part of Phoenix history and related
materials are sought for the collection.” The fact that you feel the
need to point out that diverse people are, in fact, part of the area’s
history means that you’re officially old school. That’s a given! Saying
it is like saying “I’m not racist. I’m aware that there are other kinds
of people. Even the ones with brown skin.” If you really want to
represent diverse cultural history, you wouldn’t talk about it, you
would be doing it. And by the way, “economic, social, and political” are
exactly the kinds of history I don’t do. I am
a cultural historian and anthropologist -- I look at things like food,
music, religious practices, clothing, and cultural and community
traditions. Economic, social, and political history are also officially
old school. It’s the kind of history that makes people fall asleep. You
want them to get excited about coming in as a result of stumbling across
our site. You want them to feel like there’s going to be something fun
and interesting to see once they get here. You don’t want museum
visitors to feel like they can come in to take a nap.
I am by no means a web designer, but I have put together web exhibits
and I’m really into the online environment. I’m good at research and
content development. It’s a way to reach new customers 24/7, it’s a way
to brand ourselves on the cheap until we can revamp our exhibits in real
life, and it’s a way to delve into topics that we don’t go into in our
static, boring, snooze-inducing exhibits. It’s a salvo, if you will. A
beginning, not an end. A way to start dialogue, to attract new
audiences, and to begin to be taken seriously. You can’t actually think
that this web phenomenon is a passing fad. Which is why I taught myself
stuff like Dreamweaver, CSS, & html as part of my skill set for
museums. Not enough to do web design and development professionally, but
enough to enhance the delivery of my subject knowledge. And enough to
talk with web designers semi-intelligently about things like rollover
effects, clean layout, RSS feeds, limiting the use of distracting and
unnecessary plug-ins, and mastheads. It’s not enough to be doing
traditional in-person exhibits or writing articles anymore, you must
have a decent understanding of the web’s potential, web 2.0 concepts,
and a working knowledge of how to put these technologies and media to
use for the benefit of your museum. When I talk to the Boss about it, I
can see that these things sail over her head. She doesn’t value the
importance of a professionally designed and regularly updated website.
She sees this as an opportunity to save money on an “unnecessary”
expenditure. She doesn’t understand that this is a missed opportunity. I
brought her the idea of revamping our website, and was taken aback when
she chided me for getting “off track” and straying from the “tasks at
hand.” Yes, I’ve got a lot on my plate. But web development goes hand in
hand with the other tasks ahead of me and the strategic planning for
the institution. It’s already bad enough that the place I work is the
laughing stock museum in the local museum circles. But ignoring our
website only makes it worse.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment